Current stage: Resolved
The court has ruled on a motion to dismiss, dismissing the plaintiff's mandamus claim but allowing the APA claim to proceed. The case remains pending solely on the surviving APA claim, and the order did not establish any new scheduling or service actions.
March 31, 2026
Key EventThe court resolved the defendants' motion to dismiss, granting it in part and denying it in part: the complaint's mandamus claim is dismissed, while the plaintiff's Administrative Procedure Act (APA) claim survives. The order did not set new deadlines or hearing dates.
March 31, 2026
Key EventThe court issued an opinion resolving the defendants' motion to dismiss: it found subject-matter jurisdiction and that the plaintiff plausibly stated an APA unreasonable-delay claim, but dismissed the plaintiff's request for mandamus relief as unnecessary given the APA remedy. The opinion indicates an order will follow and does not set new case-management deadlines or hearing dates.
March 16, 2026
Key EventThe docket entry indicates the court issued an order on 2026-03-16; the entry itself contains no information about the order's content, purpose, or legal effect.
February 27, 2026
Key EventThe docket entry indicates the court issued an order rescheduling the Rule 16 scheduling conference. The entry does not state the new date or time for the rescheduled conference.
February 5, 2026
Key EventThe docket entry records a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. The entry does not specify whether the dismissal is final, with prejudice, or whether any appeal or other follow-up has been filed.
December 26, 2025
Key EventThe docket entry appears to reflect a "Stipulation and Order" filed or entered on 2025-12-26; the entry text does not state the stipulation's terms or the court's specific action. The exact procedural or substantive effect of this document is unclear from the entry alone.