Current stage: Filed
The plaintiffs filed a federal complaint and the case was assigned to a district judge; the clerk issued summonses and the court granted pro hac vice admission for two plaintiff attorneys. Since filing, the docket shows multiple notices of voluntary dismissal, a notice of service of process, and entries labeled “Preliminary Injunction” and “Stay,” but none of those entries unambiguously reflect a court ruling resolving the case or granting injunctive relief.
Deadlines, hearings, and court-ordered dates from this docket
No key dates have been extracted from this case's docket yet.
Extracted from court filings. Check linked sources for official deadlines.
September 10, 2026
The docket entry is a one-word entry labeled "Stay" entered on 2026-09-10; the entry provides no further information about who filed it, whether a court granted it, or what the stay would cover. The exact procedural effect is unclear from the entry text.
September 8, 2026
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the case on 2026-09-08; the entry does not indicate who filed it or whether the court has entered any order making the dismissal effective.
September 4, 2026
On 2026-09-04 a docket entry labeled “Preliminary Injunction” was entered. The entry contains no additional information about whether it is a motion, an order, or a ruling, so the exact procedural effect is unclear from the entry text.
August 29, 2026
On 2026-08-29 a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the case. The entry does not state who filed the notice or whether the court has entered any order making the dismissal effective.
August 21, 2026
An item titled "Extension of Time to File Answer" was filed/entered on 2026-08-21; the entry does not state who filed it or whether the court granted the extension or set any new deadline.
August 7, 2026
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the case on 2026-08-07; the entry does not state who filed it or whether the court has entered an order effectuating a dismissal.
July 31, 2026
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the case on 2026-07-31. The entry does not state who filed the notice or whether the court has entered any order effectuating a dismissal.
July 24, 2026
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the case on 2026-07-24; the entry does not state who filed it or whether the court has entered any order effectuating a dismissal.
July 23, 2026
The docket entry indicates that a Notice of Service of Process was filed on 2026-07-23. The entry provides no details about who was served, who filed the notice, or any other specifics about the service.
July 22, 2026
The docket entry indicates a Declaration was filed on 2026-07-22. The entry provides no information about who filed it, its content, or any court action related to it.
July 17, 2026
The docket entry indicates that a Notice of Appearance was filed on 2026-07-17; the entry does not state who filed it or on whose behalf.
July 8, 2026
The docket entry indicates a Notice of Appearance was filed in the case on 2026-07-08. The entry does not state who filed it or on whose behalf.
July 6, 2026
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed in the case. The entry does not state who filed the notice or whether the court has entered an order effectuating a dismissal.
June 3, 2026
Attorney Lauren Elizabeth Allu filed a Notice of Appearance on behalf of the plaintiffs in the case.
June 2, 2026
The clerk's office issued an electronic notice that District Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr. has been assigned to the case; it states that if the trial judge refers any matter to a magistrate judge it will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell.
June 2, 2026
The judge entered an electronic order granting the motion for leave to appear pro hac vice for LaToya N. McBean Pompy and Lauren E. Allu. The order instructs that pro hac vice attorneys must have individual PACER accounts (including the docket number on registration), follow the court's pro hac vice instructions, and must file a Notice of Appearance on the docket.
June 2, 2026
The clerk issued summonses for all defendants and directed counsel receiving electronic notice to download, complete one summons for each defendant, and serve them in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and Local Rule 4.1; summonses will be mailed to any plaintiff not receiving electronic notice for completion of service.
June 2, 2026
Attorney Latoya Nadia McBean Pompy filed a Notice of Appearance on behalf of the plaintiffs in the case.
June 1, 2026
On 2026-06-01 the plaintiffs filed a complaint against all defendants; the $405 filing fee was paid and multiple exhibits and filing forms were attached.
June 1, 2026
The plaintiffs filed a motion (with a $250 fee) requesting that attorneys LaToya N. McBean Pompy and Lauren E. Allu be admitted pro hac vice to appear in the case; a supplement is attached.