Flores Mora v. Edlow

The plaintiff filed a notice addressing whether the pending motion for preliminary injunction applies to the first amended complaint. The entry reports the plaintiff's position about applicability but does not reflect a court ruling.

Four defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, asserting lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The docket entry reflects the filing of the motion but does not indicate any court decision on it.

Three defendants filed a memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim (document 16). The memorandum explains the defendants' legal arguments for dismissal.

Three defendants filed a response opposing the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (document 9). The filing is the defendants' opposition brief to the plaintiff's requested injunctive relief.

A hearing date was set for April 16, 2026 concerning the defendants' motion to dismiss (document 16) and the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (document 9). The entry is a notice that those matters are scheduled for hearing on that date.

The plaintiff filed a notice stating that the USCIS administrative record relating to Policy Memoranda PM-602-0192 and PM-602-0194 has been filed. The notice includes attachments labeled Exhibit A and Exhibit B.

The plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice as to one defendant, indicating the plaintiff is dismissing that defendant from the case without prejudice. The entry is the plaintiff's filed notice and does not show a court order.

The plaintiff filed a first amended complaint against the four originally named defendants and attached several exhibits. This filing replaces or supplements the original complaint with the amended allegations and exhibits.

The plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of the motion for a preliminary injunction, including a declaration and a proposed order. This is the plaintiff's supporting brief for the requested injunctive relief.

The plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking temporary court-ordered relief. The entry reflects the filing of the motion but does not indicate any court ruling on it.

The court issued an order granting a consent motion for an extension and ordered that defendants must file an answer or other responsive pleading on or before March 23, 2026. The entry is a signed court order directing a new deadline for defendants' response.

The summonses were returned executed showing the defendants were served on December 22, 2025; their answers are due February 20, 2026.

A magistrate judge granted the plaintiff's motion for pro se e-noticing on January 2, 2026.

The plaintiff filed a federal complaint challenging the government and paid the filing fee; exhibits were attached to the filing.

The plaintiff filed a pro se motion requesting to receive electronic notices from the court.