Current stage: Motion Pending
The plaintiff filed a complaint in December 2025 and an amended complaint on March 11, 2026. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 11, which the court denied without prejudice on March 17; the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on March 18, and briefing on the pending motions (including defendants' response and the plaintiffs' reply) is ongoing.
March 17, 2026
Key EventThe court issued an order denying the defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. #11) without prejudice, explaining that the plaintiff's timely amended complaint superseded the original pleading and rendered the pending motion moot; the denial leaves defendants free to renew a motion to dismiss based on the amended complaint. The order was signed by Judge James L. Robart and did not set any hearing dates or additional deadlines.
March 11, 2026
Key EventThe plaintiffs filed a formal written opposition to the defendants' previously filed motion to dismiss, arguing why the court should not dismiss the case. This submission responds to docket entry 11 and keeps the motion to dismiss actively pending before the court.
March 11, 2026
Key EventThe plaintiff filed an amended complaint against all defendants, updating the allegations and claims in the lawsuit. This replaces or supplements the original complaint and is a substantive change to the pleadings.