Current stage: Hearing Held
The court held a hearing on the defendant’s motion to dismiss on May 12, 2026, and later construed the defendant’s statement as withdrawing that motion while granting the plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 16, 2026. A one-line docket entry on July 23, 2026 reads “Remand,” but the entry does not explain who remanded or what action was taken.
Deadlines, hearings, and court-ordered dates from this docket
Plaintiff's counsel must notify the plaintiff of this Order no later than February 3, 2026.
Any objection or opposition to the Motion to Substitute Law Firm must be filed before February 5, 2026.
By 2026-03-13 the parties must file either a stipulation and proposed order with a new deadline for the defendant's motion for summary judgment or a joint letter brief if they cannot agree.
Parties must meet and confer and file a joint status report stating positions on whether discovery, a certified administrative record, or any other evidentiary record will be required; if they disagree, include each party's proposed procedure to resolve the disagreement.
Responses to the defendant's Motion to Dismiss are due by April 17, 2026.
The plaintiff's response to the defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due on 4/20/2026.
Replies in support of the Motion to Dismiss are due by April 24, 2026.
The defendant's reply to the Motion to Dismiss is due on 4/27/2026.
Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss scheduled for May 12, 2026 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros.
The parties must file a status report regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss by July 7, 2026, per the court's June 30, 2026 order.
The plaintiff must file a second amended complaint no later than July 16, 2026.
The defendant must answer or otherwise respond no later than one week after the plaintiff files the second amended complaint (calculated as July 23, 2026 if the plaintiff files on the July 16, 2026 deadline).
Per the court's prior order requiring the defendant to answer or otherwise respond within one week after the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, the defendant's response is due on 2026-07-23 because the amended complaint was filed on 2026-07-16.
Extracted from court filings. Check linked sources for official deadlines.
July 23, 2026
The docket shows a one-line entry dated 2026-07-23 labeled “Remand.” The exact meaning and procedural effect of this entry (who remanded, to whom, or whether the court issued an order) are unclear from the entry text.
July 16, 2026
An amended complaint was filed on 2026-07-16; the docket entry appears to reflect only the filing and does not indicate any court action or ruling. It may correspond to the second amended complaint the court previously authorized, but the entry itself does not specify that.
July 9, 2026
Key EventThe court construed the defendant's statement that its motion to dismiss "does not require resolution" as a withdrawal of that motion and will take no further action on it. The court granted the plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint by July 16, 2026, and ordered the defendant to answer or otherwise respond within one week after the plaintiff files the second amended complaint.
July 7, 2026
A joint status report was filed by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services on July 7, 2026, with two attachments labeled Exhibit A and Exhibit B; the entry reflects the filing only and does not state any court action or outcome.
June 30, 2026
The court issued an order directing the parties to file a status report concerning the pending Motion to Dismiss, with the status report due July 7, 2026. The order was signed by Judge Lisa J. Cisneros on June 30, 2026.
May 12, 2026
A motion hearing on the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) was held on May 12, 2026; both parties argued, and the court took the matter under submission and stated it may request further briefing. The hearing lasted about 17 minutes.
April 27, 2026
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filed a reply brief in support of its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on April 27, 2026. The entry reflects the filing of that reply and does not state any court action or ruling.
April 20, 2026
Counsel for the petitioner filed an opposition/response to the defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on April 20, 2026, attaching Exhibit A labeled "NOID."
April 17, 2026
The magistrate judge granted the stipulation to extend the deadlines for the plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss and for the defendant's reply; the plaintiff's response is due by 2026-04-20 and the defendant's reply is due by 2026-04-27.
April 17, 2026
Plaintiff's counsel filed a stipulation with a proposed order requesting a three-day extension for the plaintiff to respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss; the entry does not indicate whether the court approved the extension. The filing is dated April 17, 2026 and was modified on May 7, 2026.
April 17, 2026
A corrected stipulation with a proposed order was filed asking to extend the plaintiff's time to respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss by three days. The entry reflects the filing of the corrected stipulation and does not indicate any court action or ruling.
April 6, 2026
A joint status report was filed in the case on April 6, 2026.
April 3, 2026
Key EventThe defendant, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The motion sets a hearing for May 12, 2026, and establishes deadlines for responses and replies in April 2026.
March 24, 2026
The court ordered the parties to meet and confer and to file a joint status report by April 7, 2026 stating each side’s position on whether the case will require discovery, a certified administrative record, or any other evidentiary record, and, if they disagree, to state their positions on how to resolve that dispute.
March 20, 2026
The plaintiff, through counsel Annas Farra (with Bradley Banias noted), filed an amended complaint against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on March 20, 2026. The docket entry reflects the filing only and does not indicate any court ruling or disposition.
March 19, 2026
An attorney (Annas Farra) filed a motion for leave to appear pro hac vice, paying a $328 filing fee (receipt ACANDC-21772624) and attaching a Certificate of Good Standing; the entry reflects the filing of the motion.
March 19, 2026
The magistrate judge issued an order granting the motion for attorney Bradley Banias to appear pro hac vice in the case. The order was filed on March 19, 2026.
March 16, 2026
Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros entered an order granting the parties' stipulation regarding the summary-judgment briefing schedule.
March 13, 2026
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filed a stipulation with a proposed order regarding the motion-for-summary-judgment briefing schedule on March 13, 2026; the entry reflects the filing only and does not indicate any court approval or ruling.
March 7, 2026
The court granted the parties' stipulation to extend time and adopted the deadlines set in that stipulation. The court also ordered that no later than March 13, 2026, the parties must file either a stipulation and proposed order setting a new deadline for the defendant's motion for summary judgment or a joint letter brief if they cannot agree on a deadline.
March 6, 2026
A stipulation with a proposed order was filed asking the court to extend the defendants' deadline to file a motion for summary judgment and to extend the plaintiff's time to amend the complaint. The entry reflects the filing only and does not indicate whether the court has approved the proposed extensions.
February 6, 2026
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filed an Answer to the complaint on February 6, 2026. The entry reflects the filing only and does not state any court ruling or disposition.
February 6, 2026
The magistrate judge granted the Motion to Substitute Attorney and the order terminates attorneys Jesse Matthew Bless and Kristina David from the case.
February 2, 2026
The court acknowledged the plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Law Firm (ECF No. 19) and stated it will refrain from entering an order on that motion until no earlier than February 5, 2026 to allow time for notice. The court ordered that any objection or opposition must be filed before February 5, 2026 and that plaintiff's counsel must notify the plaintiff of this Order by February 3, 2026.
February 2, 2026
Annas Farra filed a motion to substitute the attorney of record and submitted a proposed order; the entry reflects the filing only and does not state any court action or resolution.
January 22, 2026
The court states that the parties' stipulation to extend the defendant’s time to respond to the complaint (ECF No. 17) is self-executing under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) and asks counsel not to include proposed orders with future stipulations that only extend response time. The entry is text-only and notes no separate document is attached.
January 21, 2026
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services filed a stipulation with a proposed order requesting an extension of its deadline to respond to the complaint. The document is a filing proposing an extended response deadline; the entry does not state whether the court has approved it.