Duru v. Mullin

A summons was returned executed showing the Attorney General was served on 4/29/2026; the government's answer is due 6/29/2026.

A summons was returned executed showing the defendant was served on 4/29/2026; the defendant's answer is due 6/29/2026.

A proposed summons directed to the Attorney General was submitted to the court by the petitioner's counsel on 04/29/2026.

A filing titled "Proposed Summons Markwayne Mullin - DHS" was submitted by Kimberley Chidinma Duru and entered on 04/29/2026; the entry appears to be a proposed summons but does not indicate whether the court issued it or service occurred.

A proposed summons addressed to the U.S. Attorney's Office was filed on the docket by the petitioner's counsel. The entry is a filing of a proposed summons form and does not indicate that the court issued the summons or that service has occurred.

Counsel filed a proposed summons for a defendant identified as Carrie Selby - SCOPS. The filing appears to be a routine proposed summons submission and does not indicate any court ruling or proof of service.

Counsel Kimberley Chidinma Duru filed a proposed summons directed to USCIS on April 29, 2026. The document appears to be a proposed summons form rather than a court order or ruling.

The court issued summonses for the named individual defendants as well as the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Attorney General, and provided instructions for the attorney to print, serve a copy of the summons and the complaint on each defendant, and electronically file the executed or unexecuted return of service.

A summons was returned executed indicating the defendant was served on 4/29/2026; the defendant's answer is due 5/20/2026.

A summons was returned executed indicating the defendant was served on 4/29/2026; the defendant's answer is due 5/20/2026.

The summons was returned executed, indicating the defendant was served on 4/29/2026; the defendant's answer is due on 6/29/2026.

The plaintiff filed a complaint on April 28, 2026 challenging two USCIS policy memoranda (PM 602-0192 and PM 602-0194) that place indefinite holds on adjudication of certain benefit applications, and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to compel adjudication of her pending Form I-765 and issuance of an employment authorization document within 15 days. The complaint alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act (including claims of unreasonable delay, arbitrary and capricious action, failure to follow notice-and-comment rulemaking, and ultra vires action) and notes missed USCIS guidance deadlines; no court rulings, orders, hearing dates, or service of process are reflected in the entry.

The plaintiff's counsel submitted a proposed summons, reflected on the docket on 04/28/2026. The entry does not specify any court action or service resulting from that submission.