Sarrafi v. Edlow

On 2026-05-19 the docket reflects that a Notice of Supplemental Authority was filed; the entry does not describe the authority cited or indicate any court action or ruling.

The docket entry indicates that a notice of supplemental authority was filed on 2026-05-11. The entry does not describe the authority cited or indicate any court action or any scheduled deadlines.

On 2026-04-27 the named defendants filed a joint status report in the case. The entry notes the filing but does not state the report’s contents or any court action taken in response.

The defendants filed a consent motion asking the court to stay proceedings on the complaint and submitted a proposed order with that motion. The entry reflects just the filing of the consent motion and proposed order.

The plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority. The filing includes an attached exhibit described as an order from Doe v. USCIS.

A plaintiff filed a reply to the defendants' opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction, attaching two prior preliminary-injunction orders and the PM-602-0194 administrative record.

The docket entry indicates that the named defendants filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiffs' First Motion for Preliminary Injunction (docket no. 7). The entry is a filing of the defendants' opposition and does not state any court ruling or scheduled hearing.

A return of service/affidavit was filed stating that Stephen N. Miller was served with the summons and complaint on February 17, 2026. The entry cross-references docket entry 11 for the underlying document.

The docket entry indicates the summons and complaint were served on the U.S. Attorney on 2026-02-02, and it states that answers for all federal defendants are due by 2026-04-03.

The docket entry records returns of service showing the summons and complaint were executed and that two individual defendants and the U.S. Attorney General were served on 2026-02-09; the entry refers to an associated document available at docket entry 11.

The named defendants filed a consent motion asking for more time to file a response or reply to the plaintiffs' First Motion for Preliminary Injunction (docket no. 7) and attached a proposed order.

A notice of appearance was filed indicating attorney Garrett Carter May is entering an appearance on behalf of all plaintiffs in the case.

On 2026-02-05 the plaintiffs filed their first motion for a preliminary injunction, attaching plaintiffs' declarations, the PM-602-0192 administrative record, and a proposed order. The docket entry does not indicate any court ruling or a scheduled hearing or deadline tied to the motion.

A Local Rule 7(m) statement was filed in connection with the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (docket entry 7).

The plaintiffs filed an amended civil cover sheet related to their previously filed complaint (docket entry 1). The entry appears to be an administrative filing and does not indicate any court ruling or scheduled hearing.

The plaintiffs filed a request that a summons be issued in connection with their complaint. The docket entry notes the filing was modified on 2026-02-02 and the docket text was modified on 2026-02-04.

On 2026-01-30 the plaintiffs filed an errata concerning the previously filed complaint (docket entry 1). The filing appears to correct or amend the complaint but the entry does not state the substance of the correction.

On 2026-01-30 a group of plaintiffs filed a Complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and a writ of mandamus against multiple named defendants. The filing includes attachments labeled Exhibit A (USCIS Policy Memorandum), Exhibit B (CEAC Case Status), a civil cover sheet, and a summons.