Javid v. Edlow

A Certificate/Proof of Service was filed on 2026-07-23. The entry does not state who was served or what documents were served, so the specific effect is unclear from the docket text.

A docket entry shows a document titled "Notice (Other)" was filed on July 22, 2026. The entry contains no substantive details, so the exact nature or procedural effect of the notice is unclear from the text provided.

The docket entry indicates that a Certificate/Proof of Service was filed on July 21, 2026; the entry does not state who was served or the documents served.

The docket entry appears to be a court order that terminates certain existing deadlines and hearings and sets motion-related deadlines and hearings. The entry is terse and does not identify which deadlines or hearings were affected or provide any dates or times.

A Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge form was filed on July 12, 2026; the entry does not state who filed it or whether the filer consented or declined.

The clerk's notice instructs all parties to file a consent or declination to proceed before the magistrate judge by 7/15/2026, reminds parties that withholding consent has no adverse substantive consequences, and directs the plaintiffs to immediately serve a copy of the notice on defense counsel (forms available at the court website).

The plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction with a supporting memorandum and exhibits; the filing notes a hearing set for August 18, 2026 at 10:00 AM and establishes response and reply deadlines. The docket text lists responses due July 22, 2026 and replies due July 29, 2026.

The plaintiffs filed a proposed order related to their Motion for Preliminary Injunction (docket no. 9) on July 8, 2026; the entry appears to be the parties’ proposed form of order and does not state any court decision.

The docket entry indicates that the plaintiffs filed a returned-executed summons showing service on all defendants, with three exhibits attached.

The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi and counsel are instructed to serve the complaint/notice of removal, summons, the judge's standing orders, and other new-case documents on opposing parties. The clerk will issue the summons electronically and a scheduling order will follow; the parties must file a consent to proceed before the magistrate judge or a declination by 2026-07-14.

The court entered an item titled “Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order” on June 30, 2026. The docket text does not state the order’s contents or any specific deadlines or next steps.

The docket entry indicates the clerk issued a summons as to the named defendant(s) on 2026-06-30.

The petitioners filed a notice of errata in their electronic filing concerning the complaint on June 30, 2026; the filing text was later modified on July 1, 2026. The entry appears to correct or amend the originally filed complaint docket entry.

A proposed summons was filed and entered on 2026-06-29.

On 2026-06-29 multiple plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant, attaching several exhibits including USCIS policy memoranda and related administrative-record documents.

Attorney Curtis Lee Morrison filed a notice of appearance on behalf of multiple plaintiffs in the case.