Behdin v. Edlow

Defendants filed a stipulation agreeing to produce the Administrative Record for the policy memorandum and asking that the plaintiffs' ex parte expedited-discovery application be withdrawn. This proposes that the government will provide the administrative record instead of expedited discovery.

The court granted the stipulation: the government must produce and file the Administrative Record for the challenged Policy Memorandum by February 20, 2026, and the plaintiffs' ex parte expedited-discovery application was terminated. The order resolves the discovery-dispute mechanism for now.

The court granted the stipulation extending the defendants' time to respond to the preliminary-injunction motion. The order formalizes the new briefing schedule.

Defendants filed a stipulation asking for more time to respond to the plaintiffs' preliminary-injunction motion. The stipulation requests an extension of the response deadline.

Plaintiffs filed returns of service showing the summonses were executed and the defendants were served. Exhibits documenting service were attached.

A group of plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction asking the court to block enforcement of the challenged USCIS policy and set a hearing for March 3, 2026, with responses due February 4 and replies due February 11, 2026. The motion includes legal briefing, declarations, and a proposed order.

Plaintiffs filed an ex parte application seeking expedited discovery from the government to obtain a second administrative record and other materials. The filing included legal support and a proposed order.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint asking the court for declaratory and injunctive relief and a writ of mandamus challenging USCIS policy memorandum PM-602-0194, attaching the policy memos and related exhibits. The filing lists many named plaintiffs and includes a proposed summons.