Current stage: Filed
The plaintiff has filed a civil complaint challenging USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0194, with the complaint docketed along with exhibits including the relevant memoranda and a USCIS status inquiry response. The district court has referred the case to a magistrate judge for customized case management and the clerk has issued summonses for the defendants; there is no docketed proof of service or scheduling of a hearing yet.
Deadlines, hearings, and court-ordered dates from this docket
No key dates have been extracted from this case's docket yet.
Extracted from court filings. Check linked sources for official deadlines.
May 8, 2026
The court clerk issued summonses for the individual and agency defendants named in the complaint and notified counsel that they are responsible for printing and serving those summonses.
May 7, 2026
The Clerk will issue summonses for the named defendants; counsel are instructed that they are responsible for printing and serving those summonses after issuance. Several summons form attachments were filed with the notice.
April 29, 2026
Key EventThe district court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Luke A. Evans for customized case management under Local Rule 16.01 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). The order directs lead counsel to attend an initial case management conference and states the case will be set for trial by court order after that conference under Local Rule 16.01(h).
April 28, 2026
The plaintiff filed a civil complaint against several individual defendants and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. The filing includes exhibits identified as PM-602-0192 and PM-602-0194 and a USCIS status inquiry response, and was filed with a $405 filing fee.
April 28, 2026
The docket entry is a Notice of Administrative Order No. 217 sent to the parties reminding counsel of their obligation to keep the court informed of current contact information.
April 28, 2026
The entry is a notice or informational filing concerning the parties' consent relating to a magistrate judge. The entry does not state any court ruling or the outcome of that consent process.