Current stage: Filed
The plaintiff filed an amended complaint and the government was served; an affidavit of service appears on the docket. The court issued an order on a motion to stay in October 2025 and a stay entry appears on the docket; later activity includes briefing (opposition, reply, supplemental briefs), a teleconference setting motion deadlines, a statement of recent decision, and most recently a stipulation filed without a proposed order. There is also a docket entry labeled "Dismiss AND Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction" (Jan 21, 2026), but the exact procedural effect of that entry is unclear from the docket text.
April 27, 2026
A stipulation (without a proposed order) was filed on 2026-04-27; the docket entry does not state the stipulation's terms or what relief, if any, the parties requested. The entry appears to be a routine joint filing between the parties rather than a court order.
April 24, 2026
Key EventThe court issued an order resolving defendants’ motion to dismiss, exercising federal-question jurisdiction and granting the motion in part while denying it in part; the order allows certain APA and unreasonable-delay/mandamus claims to proceed while dismissing the procedural-due-process claim and parts of the equal-protection claim. Plaintiffs were given 28 days to file an amended complaint solely to correct the deficiencies the court identified, and the order leaves available APA remedies (including potential vacatur/remand).
April 23, 2026
A filing titled "Statement of Recent Decision" was entered on 2026-04-23. The entry does not indicate whether this is a judicial order or a party submission, nor does it describe any substantive ruling or procedural effect.
April 7, 2026
The docket entry indicates a supplemental brief was filed on April 7, 2026. The entry does not specify who filed the brief, its subject matter, or any court action arising from it.
April 7, 2026
The docket entry dated April 7, 2026 indicates a supplemental brief was filed or placed on the record. The entry does not identify which party filed it, the subject matter, or whether the court has acted on it.
March 31, 2026
Key EventThe docket entry appears to indicate the court issued an order terminating previously set deadlines and hearings, and replacing them by setting new motion deadlines and hearings; the entry also references a Zoom teleconference. The exact deadlines or which specific hearings were terminated or newly set are not stated in this brief entry.
February 25, 2026
On 2026-02-25, a reply brief responding to an opposition/response was filed with the court. The entry indicates a party submitted a reply but does not state any court action or ruling.
February 11, 2026
On 2026-02-11, an opposition/response to a motion was filed in the case. The docket text does not identify which motion was opposed or state any court action or ruling.
January 23, 2026
On 2026-01-23 a document labeled "Notice (Other)" was filed in the case; the docket entry provides no further detail about the notice's content or purpose.
January 21, 2026
Key EventThe docket entry indicates the case was dismissed, citing lack of jurisdiction. The exact procedural effect (for example, whether the dismissal is final or without prejudice) is not specified in the entry.
December 24, 2025
An amended complaint was filed in the case on 2025-12-24. The docket entry shows the filing of the amended pleading but does not describe its contents or any court action on it.
December 18, 2025
The docket entry indicates that the parties filed a "Stipulation without Proposed Order" on 2025-12-18; the entry does not state the stipulation's terms or any court action. The exact procedural effect or subject of the stipulation is unclear from the entry text.
November 13, 2025
The docket shows a filing labeled "Notice (Other)" dated 2025-11-13; the entry does not describe the notice's content, purpose, or who filed it. The exact procedural effect of this notice is unclear from the entry text.
October 28, 2025
Key EventOn 2025-10-28 the court issued an order addressing a motion to stay in the case. The docket text does not state whether the stay was granted, denied, or what immediate effect the order has.
October 27, 2025
The docket entry is labeled simply "Stay" dated 2025-10-27; it appears to indicate something related to a stay in the case, but the entry text does not make clear whether a stay was entered by the court, requested by a party, or what the stay's terms or scope are.
August 7, 2025
An Affidavit of Service was filed on 2025-08-07. The docket entry does not state who was served, the date of service, or who executed the service.
June 24, 2025
On 2025-06-24 the court issued a summons directed to the United States.
June 23, 2025
The docket entry is a filing titled "Proposed Summons" dated 2025-06-23 that appears to submit a proposed summons for issuance. The entry does not indicate whether the court issued the summons or whether any defendant has been served.
June 23, 2025
A proposed summons was submitted to the court on 2025-06-23; the entry reflects the filing of a proposed summons document. The entry does not indicate that the court issued the summons or that any party has been served, so the exact procedural effect is unclear.
June 20, 2025
The docket shows a filing labeled "Proposed Summons." The exact procedural effect of this filing (who filed it or whether the court issued the summons) is unclear from the entry text.
June 18, 2025
The docket indicates the court entered a "Procedural Order" in the immigration mandamus case on June 18, 2025. The entry does not describe the contents or effect of that order.