Doe v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

The court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, finding the request reasonable and noting defendants did not oppose; the plaintiff is authorized to proceed as "John Doe." The order does not set new deadlines or hearing dates and was entered by the judge on April 1, 2026.

The court denied the plaintiff’s renewed motion for a temporary restraining order, concluding the plaintiff failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits and failed to submit evidentiary support (no declarations or administrative record) and declining to reach the other injunction factors. The order did not set any hearing dates or new deadlines, so no emergency injunctive relief was granted.

A defendant filed a response to a pending motion (likely responding to the plaintiff's TRO request).

A document titled 'Temporary Restraining Order' was filed again, reflecting either a renewed request for emergency relief or related TRO filing activity.

A summons return of execution was filed, confirming that a defendant has been served.

A summons was returned executed and filed on the docket, indicating a defendant has been formally served.

A summons was returned executed and filed, showing that another defendant (or another copy of service) was completed.

A summons return of service was filed, reflecting completed service on a defendant.

A summons was returned executed and added to the docket, indicating formal service was effected.

A summons return was filed showing that service of process was executed on a defendant.

The court issued an order addressing the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.

A document titled 'Temporary Restraining Order' was filed, reflecting the plaintiff's request for immediate injunctive relief.