Sepehri v. Mullin

A filing labeled "Notice - Other" was entered on 2026-06-19. The docket entry includes no information about the notice's content, the filing party, or any requested or ordered action, so its procedural effect is unclear.

A generic "Notice - Other" was filed on 2026-06-17; the docket entry provides no information about the notice's content, the filing party, or any requested or ordered action. The exact procedural effect of this filing is unclear from the entry text.

The docket entry indicates a summons was returned executed as to the United States (USA). The entry does not state the date of service or identify which specific federal official or office was served.

The docket entry indicates that a summons was returned executed as to the United States on 2026-06-09. The entry does not state who was served or provide any details about the service.

The docket entry indicates that a summons was returned executed as to the United States. The entry does not provide any additional details about service timing or who was served on behalf of the United States.

A document titled "Response to Motion" was filed on 2026-05-29. The filing does not state who filed it or which motion it responds to, so its precise procedural effect is unclear.

The court ordered that the plaintiff shall appear by Zoom for the motion hearing set for June 2, 2026 at 2:00 PM (Eastern time), and provided the Zoom link, meeting ID, and passcode for connection.

The docket entry indicates a "Notice of Appearance" was filed on 2026-05-28. The entry provides no additional details about who filed it or which party it concerns.

The docket shows a generic filing labeled "Notice - Other" dated 2026-05-28; the entry does not state who filed it or what the notice concerns, so its content and procedural effect are unclear.

The petitioner filed a notice referencing Docket No. 6 concerning termination of hearings, a telephone conference, setting deadlines/hearings, and the petitioner's intent to appear via Zoom. The entry is a party notice and does not state any court action or set new dates itself.

A telephonic status conference was held on May 22, 2026; the court set a deadline for the defendants to file their response to the plaintiff's motion by May 29, 2026, scheduled a motion hearing for June 2, 2026 at 2:00 PM Eastern, and ordered counsel to notify the court by May 28, 2026 whether they will appear in person or via Zoom.

The petitioner filed a notice referencing the court's Order (Dkt. No. 3) concerning set hearings; the notice itself does not state any substantive ruling or include any hearing dates, so the exact procedural effect is unclear from this entry.

The court issued summonses for the named defendants, the U.S. Attorney, and the U.S. Attorney General; an attached document is restricted to court personnel.

The court scheduled a telephonic status conference for May 22, 2026 at 10:30 AM and directed the plaintiff to notify the defendants and try to secure their participation. The plaintiff was ordered to file written notice by 9:30 AM on May 22, 2026 of its attempts to notify the defendants and secure their participation.

The petitioner filed a civil complaint on 2026-05-20 naming Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, and Markwayne Mullin as defendants and paid the filing fee. The filing includes an exhibit, a civil cover sheet, and proposed summonses for each named defendant.

The plaintiff filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction and submitted a supplemental memorandum that also requests emergency mandamus relief, along with a supporting declaration, a proposed order, and a notice of service.